Posted by: Seth Shapiro
The suit that stalked Sequoia’s $1.65B deal has been filed in SDNY. Thrust of the case is the intuitively compelling point that if a site can screen effectively for porn (which YouTube does), it should be able to apply the same methodology to screening for copyrighted material (YouTube does not).
The doc is plain-spoken. Excerpts:
Comment from Torrey Adams
Time: March 14, 2007, 7:01 pm
Youtube makes its money by allowing subscribers the freedom of creating their “own channel”.The more subscribers, the higher the ad spots. It’s the entertainment companies and individuals who seek exposure for no cost.(i.e, Myspace) Interesting.
Write a comment