Sign Up
Categories
Tag Cloud
Design Links
Finance Links
Tech Links
Archives
March, 2007
Here’s one real estate market that is definitely not softening… according to this post in Slashdot the enormous realtor consortium has bought a concentrated group of lots in the virtual community. Wonder who gets the 3%.
Posted: March 25th, 2007 under » Media.
Comments: none
Posted by Seth Shapiro
If you are interested in submitting to the Television Academy for the 2007 Emmy Awards in digital media, please drop a line to info@newamsmedia.com and we’ll be sure to get you all the relevant info.
Posted: March 24th, 2007 under » Editorial, » Media.
Comments: 2
Posted by Seth Shapiro
The cable industry had a disappointment in NY this week when Cablevision lost the suit filed against it by the major studios and networks re so-called “Network DVR” technology.
The proposed service was an alternative to standard DVRs, which place hard drives in cusomer’s homes… in Cablevision’s model, customers instead recorded programs onto servers at the cable co’s headend. They could then play, rewind and otherwise manipulate the shows remotely. This would have been a great boon for cable, as it would require much less customer support and set-top hardware for in theory the same benefits as DVR. It’s also a competitive advantage that satellite cannot offer, since they have almost no server architecture.
The studios may not like DVR but they really hated this, arguing that this service should be governed by the rights governing Pay Per View, since in their view that’s what it amounts to. And the PPV model requires an additional payment to rightsholders, unlike a DVR recording.
We can see both sides, but for involved reasons it’s ultimately fair that creators be compensated for this model. As interesting a model as server-based DVR is, it truthfully smells more like PPV or VOD than DVR. Score two for the studios.
Posted: March 22nd, 2007 under » Editorial, » Media.
Comments: none
Apropos of nothing, this occurs to me every time I see a commercial for it: I loved the first season of the thing. Trump never said anything in the boardroom that I didn’t agree with. If the boardroom was a set next to the apartment that never bothered me either. But then I started to hate it. Here’s why: after enough years of corporate life, it was just too clear how steeped in Cold Withholding Daddy the whole premise was once the novelty wore off. Most of these contestants quickly stopped doing their antics to win a job and quickly began slaving to win Bossman’s approval… Mr Trump will like this, Mr. Trump would never approve of that, blah blah.
Which, really, is a damn sad way to live. I would much prefer a show about a bunch of daypass lunatics who start their own companies. Wait, that show is on already - it’s called Los Angeles. Never mind.
Posted: March 22nd, 2007 under » Editorial.
Comments: none
The two TV Academies have yet to resolve their differences over the Emmys and digital media.
The Hollywood Reporter covers it reasonably well here, but here’s the short version:
There used to be one TV Academy. It was based in New York, as was the TV business.
Then Johnny left for Burbank. Over a period of time, the primetime industry followed. Then the LA chapter of the Academy ceded from the larger Academy, with the view that it represented the majority of those working in television. A visual representation of the conflict can be found here.
As part of the ensuing settlement, the LA Academy (ATAS) won custody of the Primetime Emmy Awards, the ones we’re all familiar with. NATAS (the NY-and-elsewhere Academy) came to preside over areas including Daytime and Technology. An uneasy truce ruled.
Then digital media came along and wreaked havoc.
If you step back, it’s a valid philosophical question: if Primetime television is delivered via new technological solutions, such as IPTV, streaming or download service, does a recogniton of merit fall under dominion of the creative guys or the technology guys? The answer is obviously both. But someone has to preside over the statue, and so the debate continues.
One day we will all undoubtedly get along. Everyone’s trying to do the right thing. Till then hopefully no one loses an eye.
Posted: March 22nd, 2007 under » Editorial, » Media.
Comments: none
There are way too many columns about the future of online video.
I recently imported all of my 2006 email onto my current laptop. Thousands of pieces of text, containing a hundred predictions from friends and strangers on the future of media. Guess what? A year later, they were almost all wrong.
Helio didn’t change the face of mobile. YouTube didn’t go under. Microsoft didn’t buy Yahoo.
There must be some mathematical proof to this effect, namely: if it were easy to do everyone would do it. If it was easy to predict it would be easy to monetize.
The growth of any top growth media area is by definition unknowable.
Let’s let the future unfold a bit, and shut up.
Posted: March 21st, 2007 under » Editorial.
Comments: 1
Move over Pat Riley… last week NBC launched a new concept called the “Newpeat” on Steve Carrell starrer “The Office”, itself a US cover of the Ricky Gervais masterpiece. The maiden voyage of this concept was a 60 minute cut of two previously-aired episodes ? with additonal footage added to round out the show. The idea is to take existing content and blend it with the type of footage that might have shown up as DVD bonus material, thereby creating a new product with no incremental spend.
Another hybrid as the Big 4 adapt to the new era. Will be interesting to see how this species evolves. Expect us to see more of these new breeds.
Posted: March 19th, 2007 under » Media.
Comments: none
Posted by Seth Shapiro
Speaking of which, analysts have speculated for some time on why profitable ringtones are more profitable than full songs. This weekend we took a stroll through the highest Google-ranked free ringtone sites. Guess what? It was cool, and slighty addictive. Mainly they were crap, civilians loading the system with UGC only their best friends would care about. But then just around the corner would be an occaisonal gem, a great Trane riff that looped just right, Beavis as Cornholio, The Munsters. Stuff that made the room say Ho!
Reminding us of what? Of a flea market, or a garage sale, or a 12 year old DJ rooting through his parents’ record collection looking for something funky to cut with.
The true spirit of hip hop is alive and well in the free ringtone cutout bin. Go see for yourself.
Posted: March 18th, 2007 under » Editorial, » Media.
Comments: none
Posted by: Seth Shapiro
Review of the new phone here. The next model, the 8300, is already being talked up in the forums, the most well-known of which is (not suprisingly) www.blackberryforums.com.
In this generation of mobile, for multiple threads of communication and well- designed User Experience, there is still nothing that can touch Blackberry.
Posted: March 18th, 2007 under » Media.
Comments: none
Posted by Seth Shapiro
… look to the numbers. Re reviving the music business via digital, a recent metric speaks volumes: the year’s mobile revs are approximately $600B. The year’s music revenues are $30B. That’s a 20x differential. And how many handsets are there vs. dedicated music players? That delta is clearly a hell of a lot bigger.
Devices = # Users and # Users = Demand. The record industry has spent decades managing by inflating prices, oligopoly and constricting supply by providing $15 albums instead of $2 singles. As we said before, how’s it working for them? Not so good.
Whoever rides the music horse in the direction that TV and mobile move will have the stronger hand. Watch.
Posted: March 17th, 2007 under » Editorial, » Media.
Comments: none